Add Memory | Add To Friends
cowboy67 (profile) wrote,
on 9-19-2006 at 3:40pm
Subject: quick freak-out session
if i have to hear that women are "naturally just more emotional" or "have more emotions" than men one more fucking time, i'm gonna beat you to death just like the rest of my non-emotional male mates might.

okay, well of course not. but PLEASE. let's look up the definition of emotion before we speak. allow me to shell out some interesting statistics about over-emotional women. er, excuse me, i meant OVER-EMOTIONAL MEN.

1) more than three women are murdered by their husbnads or boyfriends in the US every day. in the year 2000 alone, 1,247 women were killed by an intimate partner.

2) in 2000, intimate partner homicides accounted for 33.5% of the murders of women and less than 4% of the murders of men.

3) pregnant and recently pregnant women are more likely to be victims of homocide than to die of any other cause.

should i go into spousal abuse, child abuse, molestation, rape, and other irrational behaviors exhibited by men? or do they not count because crying isn't involved?

get a god damn clue, already.
Post A Comment



guajiragoddess

09-19-06 5:11pm

I especially love the automatic ruling out of football players who measure their careers by the number of legs they break.

(Inspired by Cusumano, btw)

(reply to this)


buttercup954

09-19-06 6:11pm

i hate that stupid notion too. we don't have more emotions, it's just ok for us to show them more thanks to society.
now stop crying and be a man! j/k

(reply to this)


guajiragoddess

09-19-06 8:56pm

I think we should have Psychologist's Day. So instead of saying, "Will you be my Valentine?" we could give doughnuts to you and say things like, "Will you be my psychologist?"

I'm thinking it should be set just before spring starts. Twiddlepated. Humph.

(reply to this)


moana

Re:, 09-21-06 3:18am

i second that motion!

(reply to comment)