Add Memory | Add To Friends
m&ms487 (profile) wrote,
on 10-26-2007 at 6:31pm
Rueben and I just saw Across the Universe. It was a great movie.

I don't know what more to say.

It presented realities.

I've always had a problem with reality. Not reality in the sense of knowing what's going on in the 'real' world, but my alternate realities. The ones in my head. The reality of what could happen. What might happen, what seemed to happen, what didn't happen, but seemed like it did.

I've had this problem since I was a small child.

I feel like I have so much to say, but I can't possibly scratch the surface here. I want _____ . I need _____ .

I'm good at playing by the rules, but that doesn't mean I like it.

I think I'm Marxist leftist...whatever that means nowadays.

I'm writing a speech on Mike Gravel and one of the articles I found while researching was called: "Mike Gravel, more Leftist than Marx"

How can I rely on words to explain myself when they simply can't? That's one of the things I've learned these past few years. I envy those who can use words to their advantage. I just fumble with them. I don't get them.

I got music and I turned my back on that. What do I have left? Two years of college, and three more to go so I can teach kids of average ability how to read the sentence: The cat sat on the mat.

Let's face it, without some time of national initiative on the part of the people, this country will never be more than substandard in anything but blowing things up.

Oh the things I could have done, you could have done, we could have done, if only we were given the chance. The opportunity. Limited opportunity isn't enough to make humanity what it should be.

Everything should be unlimited. Free healthcare, free education.

I don't care if we need to be like China and weed people out at sixth grade. Look who's on top. China.

Why would you let children who will never get it hinder the children who could change the country? Why do you bring down the best to make everyone average ? What good does that do?

It kills everything. It killed me.
Post A Comment



phil-himself

10-27-07 2:05am

china isn't on top, look at some economic figures. I agree that the nation has become complacent but I don't think communism nor socialism nor universialized anything is a solution. IF you want to get efficiency from something I think you need to take the government out of it.

(reply to this)


windedhero

10-28-07 9:31am

If we weeded people out at 6th grade, you think your chances of being around would be good? I think the grass might be greener on the other side, but I'd rather have the grass I've got now.

Consider being "weeded out" yourself. Would you still have the same opinion?

(reply to this)


spinder

Re:, 10-28-07 10:50am

Germany is a decent model. Same with the brits - and no one is screaming bloody murder on behalf of the poor weeded out kids.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_the_United_Kingdom#Primary_school

Might be because their k-12 system actually leaves you with prospects though.

(reply to comment)

m&ms487

Re:, 10-29-07 12:44pm

That didn't come out right because of my spiked fruit punch.

What I really believe in is having magnet schools where kids can go to specialize in their learning. For example, kids who do well in science, math, and technology go to one school that specializes in that advancement, another school for fine arts, and so on.

I do believe that specialization should start early, like in sixth grade.

I didn't mean that we should send some kids to college and others to work in factories based on some test.

My analogy for China really wasn't what I was looking for...maybe more like Germany...

oh dear.

(reply to comment)


spinder

"I don't care if we need to be like China and weed people out at sixth grade. Look who's on top. China.", 10-28-07 11:01am

Its been a few semesters since I was in my foreign governments or adolescent psychology classes, but from what I remember, most of the good weeding out systems had much more to do with identification and counseling than separation and exclusion.

If your actually advocating separating the smart kids into different schools, then you've got all kinds of problems.

I myself like the idea of an increase in personalized counseling - but that might be because my job might end up hinging on it. However, it does have its merits as a low cost method of increasing the functionality within our current educational infrastructure.

(reply to this)