03-18-08 12:26pm

I dont get it...also...what did Trent do to you Kevin? C'mon now.

(reply to this)

03-18-08 3:26pm

he has a point, the radiohead online album was in very poor quality, many have commented that fact

(reply to this)

Re:, 03-18-08 7:07pm

the point is that he follows in their footsteps, note also that radiohead is the first major band to do this, and then talks about how much better he is then them. What a narcassistic asshole.

(reply to comment)

Re: Re:, 03-18-08 7:09pm

thats trent reznor

(reply to comment)

Re: Re:, 03-19-08 11:48am

i see him as better than them.


they released a shitty quality album that you had to pay for over the internet.

NiN released one later that was better quality.

whats wrong with trent putting them in their place? someone had to publicly tell them it was shitty quality.


(reply to comment)

Re: Re: Re:, 03-19-08 10:35pm

it's just cause kevin wants to slob Thom Yorke's knob

(reply to comment)

Re: Re: Re:, 03-22-08 12:07pm

1. You don't have to pay for it if you don't want to.

2.Trent Reznor's a douchebag

3.You're wrong

4. I love you

(reply to comment)

Re: Re: Re:, 03-22-08 12:11pm

also, I don't know if anyone who's said they agree with the argument has listened to the online version, but it's really not that bad....

why don't you try listening to it, by downloading it for FREE

(reply to comment)

03-19-08 12:01pm

meh, i agree with the fidelity argument. it's always of the utmost concern to me, especially when you're talking about digital. you know how i get. i've been discovering a lot of stuff lately about bit depth that is absolutely fascinating. anyway,

i'm with you on the fact that he shouldn't be knocking them down. they're all artists - they should be trying to help each other enhance their art and make it better. of course they're going to feed off of each others ideas - and improve upon them! that's how progress is made.

so, it's up to the next artist in line to step up to the plate and show trent what the fuck is up.

(reply to this)